Battle of the dresses!

Okay, so these are the same dresses right? I mean… if they aren’t, they look pretty dang similar. The only difference that I can see is that the Charlotte Russe one is 35 inches long whereas the one at Forever 21 is only 33 inches long. Weird. I guess the lack of fabric is the reason the one at Forever 21 is $5.00 cheaper… Even though everything looks pretty similar, it’s funny that I think the Forever 21 dress looks nicer… What do you think?

(the one on the left is from Forever 21, the one on the right is from
Charlotte Russe)

Related posts:

1. Dang oh Dang. Battle of the dresses:
2. Battle of the dresses!
3. Email from our reader Kristen S. ‘Nursing Wear’

This entry was posted on Friday, July 17th, 2009 at 8:16 pm and is filed under $25 - $50, Charlotte Russe, Dresses, Forever 21. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Comments

1. camille says:

   July 17, 2009 at 10:23 pm

   Hi, love your site!

   I just bought this dress yesterday at Forever 21 (didn’t see it at Charlotte Russe!)

   I’m going to a wedding this weekend and needed something to wear. I just had my 3rd baby, and this dress is quite slimming! A little short, so I wanted a 2nd opinion. My mom (super modest), said it’s perfect!
2. Heather says:

   July 17, 2009 at 10:30 pm

   Fascinating! i mean the length and the belt clearly are different, but i think i like the forever 21 better. i might just have to have it!
3. Cathie says:

   July 19, 2009 at 9:01 pm

   The Forever 21 one does look better, but I think it’s mostly because it looks like it was on a dress form, whereas the other one seems to just kind of hang there. They were cut to fit a body, y’know? Plus, the lack of the bow give it a cleaner look. Both cute, though.
4. Kim says:

   July 20, 2009 at 1:11 pm

   I agree, the one from Forever 21 does look nicer. I wonder why that is?

   Thanks for stopping by my blog